Opinion: Trump, Putin, and the Family Business.

April 21, 2026

Trump is a Russian Asset. The pattern begins with a business deal

In 2016, while Donald Trump was running for president and denying he had any business interests in Russia, his personal lawyer Michael Cohen and his longtime business partner Felix Sater were actively negotiating a Trump Tower Moscow deal. Trump personally signed a letter of intent for the project on the night of the third Republican debate. Sater wrote to Cohen that Putin's team was on board and "I know how to play it, we will get this done." In the same email thread Sater said Putin could help Trump win the election if the deal closed.

Cohen later went to prison for lying to Congress about when the negotiations ended. He said they ended in January 2016. They continued into June 2016, while Trump was the presumptive Republican nominee and while he was publicly telling voters he had "nothing to do with Russia." That is not incidental. That is a presidential candidate negotiating a tower deal with the Kremlin while lying to the American electorate about the existence of the deal.

The pattern continues in office

In 2018, at the Helsinki press conference, Trump stood next to Vladimir Putin and publicly sided with Putin over the unanimous conclusion of all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. His own Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats, had just reaffirmed the finding. Trump said "I don't see any reason why" Russia would have done it. The one-on-one portion of that summit remains secret. The U.S. interpreter's notes were reportedly confiscated by Trump personally.

The pattern hardens in the second term

On February 28, 2025, in what is now just called "the Oval Office meeting," Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly humiliated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on live television. Trump told him to "make a deal with Russia or we're out." Five days later the administration suspended all U.S. military aid to Ukraine, and within a week they also suspended intelligence sharing. Ukrainian soldiers facing a Russian invasion briefly lost access to U.S. targeting data that protects them from Russian missiles.

Put that sequence in order. The elected leader of a country Russia is invading was brought into the Oval Office, yelled at on camera, and then had his weapons shipments and intel feed cut off. All in one week. Putin did not have to ask. The United States, under Donald Trump, volunteered.

Then came the minerals extortion

Aid resumed only after Ukraine agreed to hand over a share of its mineral wealth to the United States. The minerals deal signed on April 30, 2025 gives the U.S. a stake in Ukraine's future natural resource revenues. Crucially, the deal contains no security guarantees for Ukraine. Trump explicitly refused. Zelensky was told to sign first and discuss protection later.

This is not a peace deal. It is a protection racket. Ukraine paid the mob boss to stop hitting it, and the mob boss said sure, but only if you give up a piece of the business. The mob boss, in this metaphor, is the United States. The other mob boss, who is actually invading, faces no cost at all.

Then came the red carpet in Alaska

On August 15, 2025, Trump welcomed Vladimir Putin to U.S. soil at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. An L-shaped red carpet was unrolled for the Russian delegation, four F-22 Raptors were lined up behind the platform, a B-2 stealth bomber performed a flyover. Trump applauded as Putin walked toward him. They shook hands. They climbed into the presidential limousine together and drove to the meeting.

Putin, who is under an ICC arrest warrant for the forced deportation of Ukrainian children, received the full honors of a U.S. state visit. The summit ended with no ceasefire and no concessions from Russia. Trump's subsequent position was that Ukraine should cede territory. Time magazine's headline the next day was "Putin Got Three Major Wins From Trump in Anchorage." There was no win for Ukraine.

The Iran war launched against his own intelligence

In early 2026 Trump launched the war on Iran. His own administration told congressional staff in private briefings that U.S. intelligence did not suggest Iran was preparing a preemptive strike against American interests. U.S. intelligence agencies concluded Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. Trump called the assessment "wrong" and went anyway. CIA Director John Ratcliffe himself described the Israeli regime-change plan as "farcical." Trump overruled him.

The direct consequence of starting a war the intelligence community did not want was a spike in global oil prices. Crude jumped. Gas pump prices followed. A normal administration would have absorbed the political hit or leaned on OPEC allies. Trump did something different.

The Russian oil gift

On March 12, 2026, the Treasury Department issued a general license temporarily suspending sanctions on Russian oil shipments. Shipments already loaded on tankers as of that date could now deliver to global markets without penalty. The stated reason was calming energy markets rattled by the Iran war that Trump had just started.

Here is the part that matters. Lifting sanctions on oil already loaded on tankers does not meaningfully increase global supply. That oil was going to be delivered somewhere regardless. What the waiver did was let Russia sell that oil at full market price to buyers who had been avoiding it. By one estimate Russia picked up an additional $150 million in oil revenue per day during the waiver. That is three to five billion dollars in one month. Directly into the Kremlin's war chest.

Trump started a war against his intelligence community's advice, which spiked oil prices, which he then "solved" by handing Russia three billion dollars. The causal chain is public. The people who would have stopped it, the intelligence community, the sanctions architecture, the Treasury professionals, were overruled by the president.

What other story fits the facts

I have tried, sincerely, to construct an innocent narrative that accommodates the Moscow deal during the campaign, the Cohen perjury, Helsinki, the disappeared interpreter notes, the Oval Office ambush, the aid and intel cutoff, the minerals extortion, the Alaska red carpet for a war criminal, the Iran war launched over his own intelligence community's assessments, and the $3 billion oil sanctions gift to Moscow. Each individual item has an explanation. Together they form a pattern.

The innocent explanation requires you to believe Donald Trump is simultaneously too foolish to see that his behavior benefits Russia, too undisciplined to resist Putin's ego flattery, too narcissistic to care about national security, AND separately has had a decade of business interest in Russian real estate that just coincidentally aligns with his foreign policy. That is a lot of coincidences.

The other explanation is that the family has future business interests in Russia the American public has not been shown, that those interests require Russia to win or at least not lose, and that the foreign policy of the United States is being shaped accordingly. I do not know that this is true. I know that every public action Donald Trump has taken on Russia is consistent with it being true.

Sources: